My second novel and second in the Hennessy of the A.I.F. series is about to be in print in the next week.
This novel began with an interest not simply in the Greek Campaign itself, but in the experience of withdrawal as lived by ordinary infantry soldiers operating at small unit level. Much military history focuses understandably on strategy, command decisions, and battlefield outcomes. Those things matter. Yet for the men moving south through Greece in April 1941, the war was often experienced through roads, exhaustion, uncertainty, broken sleep, overloaded columns, bombardment, and the continual effort required simply to keep moving.

The retreat through Greece possessed a particular character that differed from many other campaigns of the war. Positions were established and abandoned in rapid succession. Defensive actions were often fought to buy time rather than secure decisive victory. Units became compressed through constant movement and repeated pressure. Men lost track not only of broader operational events, but often of neighbouring units and missing comrades. Under such conditions the preservation of small group cohesion became increasingly important.
The section at the centre of this novel is fictional, but it is intended to reflect the broader experience of Australian infantry sections operating under these conditions. The focus throughout has remained deliberately narrow. This is not a novel about generals or grand strategy. It is about movement, survival, leadership at close range, endurance, and the gradual moral and emotional compression produced by sustained retreat.
Particular attention has been given to terrain and geography because the campaign itself was shaped constantly by ground. Mountain roads, valleys, villages, ridges, embarkation beaches, and defensive slopes influenced not only tactics, but also the physical and emotional experience of the soldiers moving through them. The landscape of Greece became part of the pressure exerted upon the retreating force.
The novel is also concerned with uncertainty. Soldiers rarely possess complete knowledge of events around them. Information arrives late, incompletely, or incorrectly. Rumours move faster than certainty. Decisions are often made within partial understanding and under conditions where there may be no ideal outcome available. That uncertainty forms part of the reality of warfare and has been treated here as central rather than incidental.
The emotional tone of the novel has been shaped intentionally by restraint. The men within these pages are not presented as heroes in any simple sense, nor as victims without agency. They are soldiers attempting to continue functioning within increasingly unstable conditions. The campaign alters them gradually through accumulation rather than dramatic revelation.
The evacuation from Greece is often remembered through the successful removal of many Allied troops by the Royal Navy. Yet for the men involved, the experience was frequently one of exhaustion, fragmentation, confusion, and incomplete knowledge. Many did not know who had survived, who had been captured, or who had been left behind. Arrival on Crete brought not resolution, but continuation.
That idea became central to the writing of this novel.
The war does not pause long enough for emotional completion. Men adapt because movement forward remains necessary. Even survival itself often arrives unfinished.
This book attempts to capture something of that experience.